Why don't we have this?

Many years 'after the fact', in an inquiry that resumed today, Tony Blair was again summoned before Sir John Chilcot, to explain his involvement in the War in Iraq. His defense, which the court basically isn't buying? "I believed George W Bush", who obviously 'cherry-picked' the intelligence info he had, to justify the 'facts' that Saddam had WMD.  "To my mind, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, had nothing to do with 9/11, and I have never seen anything to make me change my mind," said Eliza Manningham-Buller, the former head of domestic intelligence service MI5.

Comments

ladyj said…
Because we censure, that's why

Popular posts from this blog

Guest columnist

You think the Repub brand is tarnished now?

Great 'bargains' at the local Sprouts store