For those who claim BOTH candidates are terrible,
let's look at the difference. Not that it makes any difference to the rightwingnuts...
Candidate 2: She tried to get us affordable healthcare a few decades ago, and then, when she couldn't, she made sure 8 million kids got covered. People on the other side of the aisle, including Henry Kissinger, said she ran the Secretary of State office "better than anyone he had ever seen”.
Could it be that the Fox News and hate radio from the Right has maligned one of these candidates, made them appear equally bad? I wonder. Hmmm, it’s a mystery.
Candidate
1:
Mr. Trump was born a millionaire. His father gave him a million dollars to
start his business, but also co-signed every business deal for Donald, right up
to and including Trump Tower. Then Donald inherited 150 to 230 million dollars.
Yet
he had to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy 4 times, and still refused to pay for
work already done by carpenters, dishwashers, plumbers, to the tune of 100
million at the Taj Casino alone. With failing businesses, he managed to pay
himself millions while they went underwater.
He
got four deferments in the Vietnam era and then claimed he had "heel spurs" to
avoid the draft (he walks fine). He has no interest in history, foreign policy,
nuclear strategy, does not understand complex issues, shows misogyny, bigotry,
daily fundamental gaps in his education. "Let’s seize the oil fields". "Why
can't we bomb them with nuclear weapons?”
Candidate 2: She tried to get us affordable healthcare a few decades ago, and then, when she couldn't, she made sure 8 million kids got covered. People on the other side of the aisle, including Henry Kissinger, said she ran the Secretary of State office "better than anyone he had ever seen”.
Could it be that the Fox News and hate radio from the Right has maligned one of these candidates, made them appear equally bad? I wonder. Hmmm, it’s a mystery.
Comments